tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367053740188758246.post2600913346205215162..comments2023-06-21T00:39:34.443-07:00Comments on Dosbat: PIOMAS January 2014Chris Reynoldshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16843133350978717556noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367053740188758246.post-45435616678650482762014-02-22T23:53:29.661-08:002014-02-22T23:53:29.661-08:00Nightvid,
The software bug is sorted now. The ima...Nightvid,<br /><br />The software bug is sorted now. The images are updated. I have a Google Drive folder with all the images and zips of each decade. See <a href="https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B3pB-kdzoLU3T2RSSGIxYkJVMlU&usp=sharing" rel="nofollow">this folder</a>.Chris Reynoldshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16843133350978717556noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367053740188758246.post-31587683462228559742014-02-22T17:35:08.235-08:002014-02-22T17:35:08.235-08:00O debugging!O debugging!Nightvidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03320916322586904305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367053740188758246.post-5986038065727249562014-02-22T10:36:01.117-08:002014-02-22T10:36:01.117-08:00I will do so, but I have a problem with my code......I will do so, but I have a problem with my code... groan...<br /><br />In my old code I could automatically generate named and titled png files. Now I find that in my new code the graph doesn't update. I spent a good chunk of the morning on the problem, but couldn't get to the root of it!<br /><br />Even if I have to manually save those few I will update tomorrow morning.Chris Reynoldshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16843133350978717556noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367053740188758246.post-47864086503234196832014-02-22T09:33:08.465-08:002014-02-22T09:33:08.465-08:00Yeah, that would be nice. I love to be able to jus...Yeah, that would be nice. I love to be able to just make the visual comparisons. We are such dorks and have such unusual forms of entertainment. :PNightvidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03320916322586904305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367053740188758246.post-42385455251480299312014-02-21T09:40:01.358-08:002014-02-21T09:40:01.358-08:00There was a difference in definitions in my previo...There was a difference in definitions in my previous code. The new data is a more understandable demarcation.<br /><br />In making the maps grid box thicknesses are 'bucketed' into bands of thickness. Previously at say 2m thick that was actually 1.75m to 2.0m. While reworking the code I decided that was a poor way of doing it.<br /><br />So now the demarcation for say 2m means 2.0m to 2.25m. This done by dividing the thickness by the band (i.e. 0.25m), and taking the integer part of the result as an index of which 'bucket' to put the grid box into.<br /><br />However it now strikes me that perhaps the blue/red change should be between the 1.75 and 2m thickness bands. I'll change that in the next run of these plots.<br />Actually I may update these this weekend.Chris Reynoldshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16843133350978717556noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367053740188758246.post-47684463675677095762014-02-21T08:07:01.892-08:002014-02-21T08:07:01.892-08:00It looks like the 2m+ area for January 2013 is inc...It looks like the 2m+ area for January 2013 is inconsistent with that shown in<br /><br />http://dosbat.blogspot.com/2013/04/piomas-2013-so-far.html#more<br /><br /><br />What gives?Nightvidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03320916322586904305noreply@blogger.com